|
|
Post by AMD on Jul 29, 2003 17:51:58 GMT -5
Although I know where this thread is gonna end up( an all out war) I always vote AMD...
|
|
|
|
Post by FritzTheCat on Jul 29, 2003 19:58:30 GMT -5
In general useage, I really don't see any differance between the two, but in my distributed computing effort, my Athalon 1800+ kicks my P4 2.2 Ghz's butt!
|
|
|
|
Post by Mad TwEaKist on Jul 30, 2003 2:22:10 GMT -5
HAHA Kev we all know the PIVs suck until they hit 2.8ghz then they rock but for money/performance ratio i WILL always choose AMD cause Kev didnt you say your self to me one day "yeah imma make the switch to AMD"
have happy day!
|
|
|
|
Post by KraZy_SkitZy on Jul 31, 2003 20:33:21 GMT -5
"yeah imma make the switch to AMD" have happy day! Yup i did, and I'm gunna, but for intel is very powerful now since they introdiced their 800mhz bud speeds, and use that with dual channel DDR and you got a rockin system, but yes your right, the money/performance ratio is in AMD's favour, but price is no object for those who want the best of the best ;D |
|
|
|
Post by AMD on Aug 1, 2003 12:28:33 GMT -5
But who has the best 64 bit CPU.....
AMD
That is the best of the best right now becuase it offers the best of both worlds. (32 and 64 bit)
|
|
|
|
Post by Mad TwEaKist on Aug 1, 2003 17:05:59 GMT -5
Intels a lil scared about the opteron cause everyones buying those CPUs for "supercomputers" cause everyone was waiting for the benchamrks for the CPU to be official no wonder intel redesigned the XEON for 1mb L3 cache
|
|
kitto3o7sp
Junior Member
He's dead Jim...
Posts: 54
|
Post by kitto3o7sp on Aug 2, 2003 0:26:32 GMT -5
AMD is the superior, to intel, as far as what its giving, but unluckily, the big people, are on intels side, so most of the marketis given to intel.
I love amd in the desktop market, but the intel Pentium M's are king of the mobles
|
|
|
|
Post by AMD on Aug 2, 2003 0:59:58 GMT -5
AMD is the superior, to intel, as far as what its giving, but unluckily, the big people, are on intels side, so most of the marketis given to intel. I love amd in the desktop market, but the intel Pentium M's are king of the mobles The Pentium Mobiles are terrible compared to their desktop counterparts. A good mobile CPU is the Centrino if anything. You know why? Because they use the least power and do well. |
|
|
|
Post by moflsh03 on Aug 3, 2003 4:32:25 GMT -5
The Pentium Mobiles are terrible compared to their desktop counterparts. A good mobile CPU is the Centrino if anything. You know why? Because they use the least power and do well. Whats this Centrino CPU all about? Heard it was a cooler running CPU and good for conserving power. Is it a completely new design for Intel or is it just an improvment on older designs? Will it ever be a option for the desktop build? |
|
|
|
Post by Mad TwEaKist on Aug 3, 2003 4:37:19 GMT -5
the Centrino is a type of chipset for the MOBILE note the "M" but the CPU is another thing thats like what you said "Pentium 4-M" there's no connection to the centrino and a CPU centrino is for the wireless networking and less power conservation Ect. its just a NEW chipset for mobile or Notebooks
|
|
|
|
Post by moflsh03 on Aug 3, 2003 4:58:51 GMT -5
Mad TwEaKist ..thanks.  You can see why I have been confused. This is not the first time I have seen the Centrino referred to in that manner. Confused to why thats the case.  |
|
|
|
Post by AMD on Aug 3, 2003 17:37:44 GMT -5
Centrino is a complete package for notebooks or laptops or whatever you want to call them. They do more with less power (electricity) and are good for WiFi.
Do not expect to see them available for any desktop systems becuase they are strictly notebook CPUs.
However, they are no near as powerful as any desktop processor could be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mad TwEaKist on Aug 4, 2003 0:02:23 GMT -5
i thought i made my self clear.... i guess not
|
|
|
|
Post by moflsh03 on Aug 4, 2003 1:13:18 GMT -5
i thought i made my self clear.... i guess not Hey now there buddy!! Yes you did. I was referring to the fact that I have seen the Centrino referred to as a CPU. For example...please take no offense AMD. I'm repeating what has been said here, but here is the deal from Intel... |
|
|
|
Post by Mad TwEaKist on Aug 4, 2003 2:00:32 GMT -5
oh ok i was jus like IM RIGHT why is he confused maybe i was confused why you were confused
|
|
|
|
Post by AMD on Aug 4, 2003 10:30:34 GMT -5
And now I am confused as to why everything is becoming confusing. Confusion is not a good thing and when the confused confuse the unconfused, then the confusion grows and creates greater confusion...  Tweakist's answer is more correct than mine. Much more correct. |
|
|
|
Post by Mad TwEaKist on Aug 4, 2003 15:14:24 GMT -5
thank you
|
|
|
|
Post by KraZy_SkitZy on Aug 4, 2003 16:00:17 GMT -5
Tweakist's answer is more correct than mine. Much more correct. Well being proved rong or incorrect is all part of better learning ;D |
|
kitto3o7sp
Junior Member
He's dead Jim...
Posts: 54
|
Post by kitto3o7sp on Aug 21, 2003 18:50:24 GMT -5
Hey, this did become an all out war. AMD is not included in this though. I'd like to call this war IWI, Intel war1.  There is nothing to be confused about, except confusion itself. |
|
You can see why I have been confused. This is not the first time I have seen the Centrino referred to in that manner. Confused to why thats the case. 
